Skip to content
El Supremo disgracefully induces suicide

El Supremo disgracefully induces suicide

El Tribunal Supremo has confirmed Absolute Sentencing that the Provincial Audit of Barcelona dictated to a a person who has been accused of having collaborated in the suicide of a person to have appointed that as a beneficiary of a life policy, for the existing existence between them for the case in which it is bankrupt, the one that is uncorrected, for imports of 499,000 euros.

Under the circumstances of the police había una clause because there was a suicide in the first year after the police did not cover itbut the bankruptcy is granted to the widows after they presented the bailiff to the police through the bankruptcy.

The spectator court declared probado tras festival juicio que “Engin hefur leitt til probado, fuera de toda duda razonable, ninguna otra persona interveniera, directa oder indirectamente, en la decisión de quitarse la vida de …”. Sentence was reclaimed at the Supreme by the family of the bankrupt and by a secure company, as well as particular charges.

Í setningur que ha sido ponente el Magistrado Vicente MagroPresident of the Court as President Andres Martínez Arrieta y los Magistrados Juan Ramon Berdugo, Ana Maria Ferrer there Susana Polo kemst að því að „Frente a la pretension del recidente de incidir en quedó tók efter el Psychologo aspect de la influenza del accusado en el falecido, y que todo fue movido por subscription of una policy de vida con de entidad la en la that… appears that… as a torturer and insurer and the accused as a rétthafi, without trade bans, has not been able to conclude by the inference obtained by the Tribunal that the registration of this policy of predetermined and concert through the transcourse of the year…. acabara con su vida y el acusado mun fá economic benefit.

“Ha sido ponente el Magistrado Vicente Magro” (Mynd: Manuel Lorenzo)

It is not possible to get a decision from the court, you are trying to do it but it is not possible to do so that it is possible to monitor the psychological effects of acusado but… quitara la vidaand it does not determine a nullity and a condition that plants the part. “

Añade el Tribunal Supremo que “Refiere el Tribunal que la politisse investigatie manejó idea of ​​a direct participation of the accused in the death of…”, þó. þessi forskningnarlína fue abandonada tras conocer the result of the caliber graphic peripheral test about the note of suicide who decided to have written the bankruptcy without the intervention of a third person. Además, the police officers who took part in the eyepiece inspection that when the corpse was taken away, the death produced by a suicide by the ingestion of pharmacies, while the existence of life insurance is being continued and the indigenous evidence is confirmed. , Señalando que el acusado podría hefur tenido influence en lo ocurrido. Without a trade embargo, the Court is aware of a detailed explanation of evidence and a detailed explanation of competitors, but that is not a conclusion that is sufficiently contradictory to say that it is comparable to what is being known.

With this, it can not predict the existence of a condensate by which it can be classified as, must be deducted from the disposition by the Tribunala series of random circumstances, assumptions or assumptions that it would be nice to hear a conspiracy en losun, but it is obvious that decisive clues about a condena deben have a qualifier of mayor translation, and no debe confundirse que una sum de coincidences, o sospechas, puede lalle existencia de una condena enervando la presumption of innocence by the competition of indications that are not legally tenid as speeches, this is what the Tribunal concludes of a motivated form, analyzing each of the indications that are acted upon by the judge, although deciding that its competition may have relevance and sufficient suffix entity to determine the meaning of a condensate.

“You can not derive a participation from someone who has been accused” (Mynd: E&J)

Today, the Court provides for explanations on the existence of the Court, which is determined not to be a sufficient reason to recover part of the Court, but it is provided for, but it is not correct. along with indications of possible una. De suyo, lo que hace el Tribunal es relatar que la sum of inconsistent varios indicios It is not until then that one proceeds to be sufficient and according to to avoid the premise of innocence, declaring the Tribunal that this is what we owe in the case that we occupy.

Show it to the court the main index is a subscription in part to the fallecido seguro policy where the beneficiary is acusado. But it is important that the court, which is the court, which is the power to form voluntary and solitary confinement, tantamount to the firm as the vices in the case that you need to provide the necessary documentation, and it is by virtue of being accredited by its increased scope tramitación.

After another, refiere el Tribunal que incorporation of a provision on the shortage of a year for suicide pudo haberse tried to eliminate the median pact in contrast and conllevaba a riesgo de which hecho produce antes del transcurso del plazo, but in the supuesto of accepting the maneuver idea by the accusation that no security can be held about the moment at which… adopt his decision and the liver a cabo. There are also pieces of evidence, the court declared that there was no co-ordination of the court regarding its location at the time when the death could not be a transcendence takes place, which could not be prosecuted in an oral trial to commit a crime near donde finds the moment of hecho.

Destaca el Tribunal que circunstancia where el pago’s claim for damages in the form of inmediata tampoco is an appropriate dateit is the perfect period of obviousness to be able to know the existence of the misdemeanor and its benefactor character, because the haberdas commented on the bankruptcy, but it does not determine the existence of a precautionary measure of tenure …

Finally, the Court explains a detailed and sufficient form Reasons given by those who indicate that they have been exposed to the accusation without having the character or sufficiency as to determine the existence of a condition by the allegation of a poor product preconceived notions and concerts of the accused with the failure, and in a hecho tan gröf and lamentable as the wrong, but in that no one can derive a participation of who has been accused, as he has tried the Tribunal, ante the non-existence of a trial of a test and concluding that allows the inference to descend all reasonable reason to allow the dictation of a condena.

Start investing your money in cryptocurrencies and get Free Bitcoin when you buy or sell 100$ or more if you register in Coinbase